Section 127 of BNS 2023: Offenses of Wrongful Restraint and Confinement

Overview

Section 127 of BNS 2023 addresses offenses related to wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement. It outlines the punishments for these offenses based on the duration and intent of the confinement, ranging from imprisonment to fines.

Punishment

The punishments under Section 127 are structured based on the nature and duration of the wrongful confinement:

  1. General Wrongful Confinement: Imprisonment for up to one year, or a fine up to ₹5,000, or both.
  2. Confinement for Three Days or More: Imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine up to ₹10,000, or both.
  3. Confinement for Ten Days or More: Imprisonment for up to five years, with a mandatory fine not less than ₹10,000.
  4. Confinement Despite Liberation Writ: Imprisonment for up to two years in addition to any other term of imprisonment and fine.
  5. Confinement with Intent to Conceal: Imprisonment for up to three years in addition to any other punishment and fine.
  6. Confinement for Extortion of Property or Information: Imprisonment for up to three years, and fine.
  7. Confinement for Extortion of Confession or Information Leading to Crime Detection: Imprisonment for up to three years, and fine.

Key Elements

  • Wrongful Restraint: Preventing a person from proceeding beyond certain circumscribing limits.
  • Wrongful Confinement: Restricting a person within certain boundaries so they cannot move beyond those limits.
  • Severity and Intent: The punishment varies based on how long the person was confined and the purpose behind the confinement.

Examples

  1. General Wrongful Confinement: A person locks someone in a room, preventing them from leaving. This act is punishable under this section.
  2. Confinement with Threats: Placing armed guards at exits and threatening to shoot if the confined person tries to leave is considered wrongful confinement.
  3. Confinement Despite Liberation Writ: Continuing to confine someone even after a court has issued a writ for their release incurs additional punishment.
  4. Confinement to Extort Property: Kidnapping someone and holding them hostage to demand ransom is an example of confinement for extortion.
  5. Confinement to Obtain Information: Detaining someone to force them to reveal information about a crime or hidden property also falls under this section.

Historical Context

The concept of wrongful restraint and confinement has its roots in ancient legal systems, aimed at protecting personal liberty and freedom of movement. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) initially provided the framework for these offenses. The BNS 2023 updates and refines these provisions to address modern challenges, ensuring that the law remains effective and relevant.

Legislative Intent

The legislative intent behind Section 127 of BNS 2023 is to safeguard individual freedom and personal safety. By clearly defining and punishing wrongful restraint and confinement, the law aims to deter such behavior and uphold the principles of justice and human rights. The tiered punishment system ensures proportionality, reflecting the seriousness of the offense.

Conclusion

Section 127 of BNS 2023 plays a crucial role in protecting individuals from wrongful restraint and confinement. It establishes clear guidelines and punishments, ensuring justice and accountability. This legal provision underscores the importance of personal liberty and aims to deter acts that infringe upon it.


Subscribe to The New Indian Laws

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe